Triple
T31972496
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of Judicature |
E816352
|
entity |
| Predicate | modifiedByStatute |
P173066
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1875 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1875 | Statement: [Supreme Court of Judicature, modifiedByStatute, Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1875]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: modifiedByStatute Context triple: [Supreme Court of Judicature, modifiedByStatute, Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1875]
-
A.
establishedByStatute
Indicates that something has been formally created, defined, or authorized through a specific law or statute.
-
B.
hasStatuteLaw
Indicates that a jurisdiction or entity is governed by, or possesses, a body of formal written laws enacted by a legislative authority.
-
C.
isStatutory
Indicates that something exists, applies, or is defined by virtue of formal law or statute rather than by custom, contract, or other sources.
-
D.
overruledByStatute
Indicates that a legal rule, decision, or principle has been superseded or invalidated by a later-enacted statute.
-
E.
hasSpecialStatute
Indicates that a subject is governed by, or associated with, a specific legal or regulatory statute that grants it particular rules, status, or treatment distinct from general provisions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f5ae5481909da0247869f51955 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b342499c8190b85009a3f0f179e4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b151ad008190836c1bcdec503ce2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:22 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6b21da77081908c5c015c4606d344 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:10 a.m.