Triple

T31951183
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mapuche communities of Wallmapu E815782 entity
Predicate hasTraditionalAssembly P198389 FINISHED
Object trawün LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trawün | Statement: [Mapuche communities of Wallmapu, hasTraditionalAssembly, trawün]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTraditionalAssembly
Context triple: [Mapuche communities of Wallmapu, hasTraditionalAssembly, trawün]
  • A. traditionalAssembly
    Indicates that an entity is created, constructed, or put together using conventional, established methods rather than modern or alternative techniques.
  • B. hasAssemblyLine
    Indicates that one entity possesses or operates an assembly line used for producing or assembling items.
  • C. hasTraditionalFormIn
    Indicates that something possesses a customary or historically established form or representation within a specified context, system, or location.
  • D. hasAssembly
    Indicates that an entity is composed of, or includes, one or more component parts assembled into a whole.
  • E. hasTraditionalBase
    Indicates that something is supported by, built upon, or derived from an established traditional foundation or practice.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348f42d188190a33fc8d20ec50517 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fee0b2da3c8190a3519d0564f2f32d completed May 9, 2026, 7:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fee05b315c819081dfcbfb15273487 completed May 9, 2026, 7:20 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fee0b03a0c81909117dc5915d77295 completed May 9, 2026, 7:22 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:07 a.m.