Triple
T31945612
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sur les lagunes (in G minor) |
E815642
|
entity |
| Predicate | followedInCycleBy |
P195504
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Absence |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Absence | Statement: [Sur les lagunes (in G minor), followedInCycleBy, Absence]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: followedInCycleBy Context triple: [Sur les lagunes (in G minor), followedInCycleBy, Absence]
-
A.
followsCycle
Indicates that one entity adheres to or repeats a recurring sequence, pattern, or cycle defined or exemplified by another entity.
-
B.
includedInCycle
Indicates that an entity participates in and is part of a closed loop or recurring sequence within a system or structure.
-
C.
followedIn
Indicates that one entity began following or subscribing to another entity, typically in a social or sequential context.
-
D.
cycleFollowedBy
Indicates that one cycle occurs immediately after or as a direct successor to another cycle in a sequence or process.
-
E.
followsIn
Indicates that one entity comes after or succeeds another in a sequence, order, or progression.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f42d188190a33fc8d20ec50517 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fdd5fba5048190b7d430ae2054a1fd |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fdd35f76f88190a1854ea27132f9c7 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:13 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fdd5faea908190a17d77e050362ef5 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:24 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:06 a.m.