Triple
T31943861
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | V_tb |
E815594
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMagnitudeConstraintSource |
P202252
|
FINISHED |
| Object | single top production measurements |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: single top production measurements | Statement: [V_tb, hasMagnitudeConstraintSource, single top production measurements]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMagnitudeConstraintSource Context triple: [V_tb, hasMagnitudeConstraintSource, single top production measurements]
-
A.
hasMagnitudeProperty
Indicates that an entity is associated with a quantitative magnitude-related property, such as size, intensity, or amount.
-
B.
hasResourceConstraint
Indicates that an entity is subject to a limitation or restriction on the resources it can use or access.
-
C.
hasFormalConstraint
Indicates that an entity is governed or restricted by an explicitly defined formal rule, condition, or limitation.
-
D.
hasConstraintArity
Indicates that a constraint is associated with a specific number of arguments or elements it applies to.
-
E.
constrainedBy
Indicates that one entity’s state, behavior, or possibilities are limited, restricted, or governed by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f42d188190a33fc8d20ec50517 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0067cde0f08190b2cd93af5f00d519 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 11:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0065820c8c8190994734433c64a30a |
completed | May 10, 2026, 11:01 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a0067cd38bc8190a719e9d1a287cd95 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 11:11 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:06 a.m.