Triple
T31920342
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yakus |
E814950
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalCaseOutcomeFor |
P30903
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conviction upheld by U.S. Supreme Court in Yakus v. United States |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conviction upheld by U.S. Supreme Court in Yakus v. United States | Statement: [Yakus, legalCaseOutcomeFor, conviction upheld by U.S. Supreme Court in Yakus v. United States]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCaseOutcomeFor Context triple: [Yakus, legalCaseOutcomeFor, conviction upheld by U.S. Supreme Court in Yakus v. United States]
-
A.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
chosen
Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
-
C.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
D.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
-
E.
legalConclusion
Indicates that a situation, set of facts, or argument leads to or supports a specific determination or outcome under the law.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f1df848190851bbfb988da3414 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69feafa1ba0081909013800b85a9f613 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69feae58d62c81909d031f3df8992883 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:47 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:03 a.m.