Triple
T31908248
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tianming |
E814612
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEpistemicSign |
P143137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | omens and portents |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: omens and portents | Statement: [Tianming, hasEpistemicSign, omens and portents]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEpistemicSign Context triple: [Tianming, hasEpistemicSign, omens and portents]
-
A.
epistemicCondition
Indicates that one situation or proposition holds only under certain knowledge, belief, or informational conditions related to another.
-
B.
usesEpistemicMeans
Indicates that an agent employs knowledge-related methods, reasoning, or informational tools as the means to carry out or support an action or relationship.
-
C.
epistemicAttitude
Indicates the type or stance of a subject’s knowledge, belief, or certainty toward a proposition or statement.
-
D.
epistemicBasis
chosen
Indicates the justificatory relationship by which one piece of information, belief, or evidence serves as the basis for holding another belief or knowledge claim.
-
E.
epistemicStatus
Indicates the degree of certainty, justification, or knowledge an agent has regarding a particular proposition or claim.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f109d88190b5005372c53d2fcd |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b1b6a1f08190b1d5306ae35977cb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aca59d4881908d14ed47962703bd |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:01 a.m.