Triple
T31904845
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prorogation of Parliament (September 2019) |
E814518
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalEffectOfJudgment |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Parliament was deemed never to have been prorogued |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Parliament was deemed never to have been prorogued | Statement: [Prorogation of Parliament (September 2019), legalEffectOfJudgment, Parliament was deemed never to have been prorogued]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalEffectOfJudgment Context triple: [Prorogation of Parliament (September 2019), legalEffectOfJudgment, Parliament was deemed never to have been prorogued]
-
A.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
judgmentInvolves
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
-
C.
judgmentResult
Indicates the outcome or decision produced by a judgment, such as a court ruling, evaluation, or formal assessment, regarding the entities involved.
-
D.
leadingJudgmentBy
Indicates a relationship where one judgment or legal decision is treated as the primary or authoritative basis guiding or influencing another judgment.
-
E.
legalConclusion
Indicates that a situation, set of facts, or argument leads to or supports a specific determination or outcome under the law.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f04d7881909537fc9e7cbc670e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69feaa483fcc81909d8a46b38a8717bf |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fea8c9d45c81908ccc8619e5fefac1 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:23 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, midnight