Triple
T31904842
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prorogation of Parliament (September 2019) |
E814518
|
entity |
| Predicate | supremeCourtDecision |
P172483
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unlawful |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unlawful | Statement: [Prorogation of Parliament (September 2019), supremeCourtDecision, unlawful]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supremeCourtDecision Context triple: [Prorogation of Parliament (September 2019), supremeCourtDecision, unlawful]
-
A.
supremeCourtHolding
chosen
Indicates that a decision or legal principle has been formally established by a supreme court as the authoritative resolution of a legal issue.
-
B.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
C.
SupremeCourtVote
Indicates the voting decision or stance taken by a justice (or justices) in a case before the Supreme Court.
-
D.
SupremeCourtHoldingRelatedTo
Indicates that there is a connection between a Supreme Court holding and another legal element, such as a case, issue, statute, or principle, to which that holding specifically relates.
-
E.
notableSupremeCourtCase
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f04d7881909537fc9e7cbc670e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b1b2be408190bef7834aa16578a8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aca59d4881908d14ed47962703bd |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, midnight