Triple
T31904655
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | First Johnson ministry |
E814514
|
entity |
| Predicate | courtRulingRelatedTo |
P41134
|
FINISHED |
| Object | R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland | Statement: [First Johnson ministry, courtRulingRelatedTo, R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: courtRulingRelatedTo Context triple: [First Johnson ministry, courtRulingRelatedTo, R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland]
-
A.
judgmentInvolves
chosen
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
-
B.
decisionCourt
Indicates that a particular court rendered the decision or judgment in a given legal case or proceeding.
-
C.
SupremeCourtHoldingRelatedTo
Indicates that there is a connection between a Supreme Court holding and another legal element, such as a case, issue, statute, or principle, to which that holding specifically relates.
-
D.
legalRulingNature
Indicates the type or character of a legal ruling, such as its form, basis, or procedural nature.
-
E.
courtIssue
Indicates that a court formally issues or hands down a legal document, order, ruling, or decision to the relevant parties.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f04d7881909537fc9e7cbc670e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b1b2be408190bef7834aa16578a8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aca59d4881908d14ed47962703bd |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, midnight