Triple
T31894874
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Earl of Chichester |
E814251
|
entity |
| Predicate | linkedConstituency |
P2710
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sussex |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sussex | Statement: [Earl of Chichester, linkedConstituency, Sussex]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: linkedConstituency Context triple: [Earl of Chichester, linkedConstituency, Sussex]
-
A.
coreConstituency
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary, most important group of supporters or audience for another entity.
-
B.
constituency
Indicates that one entity functions as a constituent or component part within the structural or organizational makeup of another entity.
-
C.
votingConstituency
Indicates the electoral district or constituency in which an entity has the right or obligation to vote.
-
D.
parliamentaryConstituency
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the parliamentary constituency to which the other entity (such as a place or representative) is formally linked or assigned.
-
E.
isCountyConstituency
Indicates that a political constituency is defined at the county level or corresponds to a specific county within a larger electoral or administrative system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348ef817481908440e2250319bcc8 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd4f39b5008190b83b3227ce22c509 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd4df17c548190a4e2a6fea70f7e10 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:58 p.m.