Triple
T3188372
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eritrean Catholic Church |
E66756
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOwnCanonLawParticularNorms |
P43362
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Eritrean Catholic Church, hasOwnCanonLawParticularNorms, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOwnCanonLawParticularNorms Context triple: [Eritrean Catholic Church, hasOwnCanonLawParticularNorms, yes]
-
A.
hasOwnCanonLawParticularLaw
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses its own specific set of canon or particular laws distinct from general or universal church law.
-
B.
usesCodeOfCanons
Indicates that one entity applies, follows, or is governed by a specified code of canons (a formal set of rules or laws).
-
C.
canonLawSubject
Indicates that an entity is the subject or topic governed, regulated, or addressed by a particular canon law or set of canonical legal norms.
-
D.
customaryLaw
Indicates that a relationship, behavior, or rule is governed by unwritten, traditional norms and practices recognized as binding within a community or group.
-
E.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8587c1bc8190a2595f2c22ee1001 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada6e491508190bc881feaee3889bc |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9e04290481909092ddfbe6fdaabc |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:06 p.m.