Triple
T31883337
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Malia stone block with hieroglyphs |
E813938
|
entity |
| Predicate | writingDirectionStatus |
P172689
|
FINISHED |
| Object | uncertain |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: uncertain | Statement: [Malia stone block with hieroglyphs, writingDirectionStatus, uncertain]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: writingDirectionStatus Context triple: [Malia stone block with hieroglyphs, writingDirectionStatus, uncertain]
-
A.
hasWritingDirection
Indicates the direction in which writing or text is read or written for a given script, language, or text system.
-
B.
translationDirection
Indicates the source and target languages involved in a translation, specifying the direction from the original language to the translated language.
-
C.
traditionalWritingStatus
Indicates the status or condition of something with respect to its use of traditional writing forms or scripts.
-
D.
writingSystemStatus
Indicates the current functional or sociolinguistic state of a writing system, such as whether it is actively used, obsolete, official, or endangered.
-
E.
writingsStatus
Indicates the status or condition of a set of writings (e.g., whether they are drafted, reviewed, published, or otherwise processed) in relation to an entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348ed74bc81909846aaa6a3c7318c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b0d99fe08190897822f9b6406e11 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aca59d4881908d14ed47962703bd |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6af7d92008190aead47eaae8cc091 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:14 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:56 p.m.