Triple
T31881292
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lebanon (traditional location of Cedar Forest) |
E813889
|
entity |
| Predicate | woodExportedTo |
P172687
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mesopotamia |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mesopotamia | Statement: [Lebanon (traditional location of Cedar Forest), woodExportedTo, Mesopotamia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: woodExportedTo Context triple: [Lebanon (traditional location of Cedar Forest), woodExportedTo, Mesopotamia]
-
A.
woodProperty
Indicates that one entity specifies or characterizes a property or attribute of wood associated with another entity.
-
B.
hasWood
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is made of wood in relation to another entity or context.
-
C.
woodTradeName
Indicates the commercial or trade name under which a particular type of wood is marketed or known.
-
D.
woodSimilarTo
Indicates that one wood is similar to another in relevant characteristics such as type, appearance, or properties.
-
E.
topWood
Indicates that one entity is made of or features a particular type of wood used specifically for its top surface or top section.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348ed74bc81909846aaa6a3c7318c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b0d697c881909520acc306c026eb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aca59d4881908d14ed47962703bd |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6af7d92008190aead47eaae8cc091 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:14 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:56 p.m.