Triple

T31878343
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dowager Duchess E813804 entity
Predicate mayBeSupersededInPrecedenceBy P180901 FINISHED
Object current duchess consort LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: current duchess consort | Statement: [Dowager Duchess, mayBeSupersededInPrecedenceBy, current duchess consort]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeSupersededInPrecedenceBy
Context triple: [Dowager Duchess, mayBeSupersededInPrecedenceBy, current duchess consort]
  • A. supersededInPrecisionBy
    Indicates that one entity’s level of precision has been replaced or overtaken by another entity’s greater precision.
  • B. confersPrecedenceIn
    Indicates that one entity is granted higher priority, rank, or standing over another within a specified context or domain.
  • C. wasSupersededBy
    Indicates that one entity has been replaced or made obsolete by another entity that takes over its role or function.
  • D. isSuccessorTo
    Indicates that one entity directly follows another in an ordered sequence, coming immediately after it.
  • E. usedByPredecessorOf
    Indicates that something is used by an entity that is the predecessor of another entity in a sequence or hierarchy.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348ed74bc81909846aaa6a3c7318c completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f757898fe48190b124dc7301672623 completed May 3, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f754c484348190948d2a04ff228fb1 completed May 3, 2026, 1:59 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f75788d40c819083bf2567b3091585 completed May 3, 2026, 2:11 p.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:55 p.m.