Triple
T31877091
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | City Director |
E813771
|
entity |
| Predicate | levelOfResponsibility |
P85242
|
FINISHED |
| Object | highest administrative level in city government |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: highest administrative level in city government | Statement: [City Director, levelOfResponsibility, highest administrative level in city government]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: levelOfResponsibility Context triple: [City Director, levelOfResponsibility, highest administrative level in city government]
-
A.
typeOfAccountabilityDiscussed
Indicates that the relationship specifies which kind or form of accountability is being discussed in a given context.
-
B.
ordinationLevel
chosen
Indicates the hierarchical rank or degree of authority assigned to an entity within an ordered or structured system.
-
C.
responsibleFor
Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
-
D.
designationLevel
Indicates the specific rank, tier, or level assigned to an entity within a designation or classification system.
-
E.
accountabilityTo
Indicates that one entity is responsible for explaining, justifying, or answering for its actions, decisions, or outcomes to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348ed74bc81909846aaa6a3c7318c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b21e7e088190832a3db585daea1c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b14faf608190a25b977c0740729c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:55 p.m.