Triple

T31872838
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Röhrmoos E813651 entity
Predicate hasMunicipalKeyType P3943 FINISHED
Object Gemeindeschlüssel LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gemeindeschlüssel | Statement: [Röhrmoos, hasMunicipalKeyType, Gemeindeschlüssel]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMunicipalKeyType
Context triple: [Röhrmoos, hasMunicipalKeyType, Gemeindeschlüssel]
  • A. hasMunicipalityType
    Indicates that an administrative unit is classified as having a specific type or category of municipality (e.g., city, town, village).
  • B. hasMunicipalAgencyType
    Indicates that a municipal agency is classified as having a specific organizational or functional type.
  • C. hasMunicipalCodeAuthority
    Indicates that an entity has the official power or jurisdiction to create, adopt, or enforce municipal codes, ordinances, or regulations.
  • D. hasMunicipalityCode chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific official municipality code used for administrative or identification purposes.
  • E. hasMunicipalCodeJurisdiction
    Indicates that an authority or entity holds official legal or regulatory power within a specific municipal code area or jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348ecb07481909c8f72619131b115 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd2a215d6c8190a1a428ccaee603f1 completed May 8, 2026, 12:11 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd28ef19688190bb8370f2812a43e7 completed May 8, 2026, 12:06 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:55 p.m.