Triple

T31857160
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mrass dialect E813228 entity
Predicate instanceOf P0 FINISHED
Object regional variety of the Shor language C61381 CONCEPT FINISHED

How this triple was built (1 step)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

CD Concept disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional variety of the Shor language
Context triple: [Mrass dialect, instanceOf, regional variety of the Shor language]
  • A. regional variety of the Kumyk language
    A regional variety of the Kumyk language is a geographically defined form of Kumyk that exhibits distinct phonological, lexical, or grammatical features while remaining mutually intelligible with other Kumyk dialects.
  • B. regional variety of Jingpo language
    A regional variety of the Jingpo language is a geographically or socially distinct form of Jingpo characterized by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features while remaining mutually intelligible with other Jingpo varieties.
  • C. regional variety of Burushaski
    A regional variety of Burushaski is a geographically distinct form of the Burushaski language characterized by localized differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and sometimes grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other Burushaski varieties.
  • D. regional variety of Siwu language
    A regional variety of the Siwu language is a geographically and socially distinct form of Siwu characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and sometimes grammar from other Siwu-speaking areas.
  • E. variety of the Nogai language
    A variety of the Nogai language is a regional or social form of Nogai distinguished by specific phonological, lexical, or grammatical features while remaining mutually intelligible with other Nogai forms.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (1 batch)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348ebf32881908d9439646933dc76 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:52 p.m.