Triple
T31857003
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Li'l Zé |
E813223
|
entity |
| Predicate | appearsInWorkCoDirectedBy |
P192657
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kátia Lund |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kátia Lund | Statement: [Li'l Zé, appearsInWorkCoDirectedBy, Kátia Lund]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appearsInWorkCoDirectedBy Context triple: [Li'l Zé, appearsInWorkCoDirectedBy, Kátia Lund]
-
A.
appearsInWorkDirector
Indicates that an entity appears in a creative work in which the associated director is responsible for directing that work.
-
B.
coDirectedWith
Indicates that two or more entities jointly directed the same work or project.
-
C.
workOfDirector
Indicates that a creative work (such as a film, play, or show) is directed by a particular director.
-
D.
directorOfWorkHeAppearsIn
Indicates that a person serves as the director of a work (such as a film, show, or production) in which he himself appears.
-
E.
workOfDirectorKnownFor
Indicates that a work (such as a film or show) is directed by a person for whom this work is one of their notable or best-known creations.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348ebf32881908d9439646933dc76 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd231cab588190ad0953dc8f4af8f2 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 11:41 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd1aa3f1c481909fe6e9cab1383551 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 11:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd231bdd108190900369e07c854e95 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 11:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:52 p.m.