Triple
T31850818
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Valeant Pharmaceuticals |
E813059
|
entity |
| Predicate | restated |
P25867
|
FINISHED |
| Object | certain financial results |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: certain financial results | Statement: [Valeant Pharmaceuticals, restated, certain financial results]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: restated Context triple: [Valeant Pharmaceuticals, restated, certain financial results]
-
A.
reintroduced
Indicates that an entity that was previously removed, extinct, or absent has been brought back or restored to a place, context, or state.
-
B.
reproclaimed
Indicates that something was proclaimed or announced again, typically reaffirming or restating a previous declaration.
-
C.
recreated
Indicates that an entity has been created again or restored, typically after being removed, destroyed, or significantly altered.
-
D.
reiterates
chosen
Indicates that an entity repeats or restates something that was previously expressed, often to emphasize or clarify it.
-
E.
reargued
Indicates that an argument, case, or issue was presented and debated again, typically after having been argued previously.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348eb327881909b4584b925742f6e |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b03c50ac8190a21a7721219b0167 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aca59d4881908d14ed47962703bd |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:51 p.m.