Triple

T31840411
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mesh-ki-ang-gasher E812786 entity
Predicate consideredByModernScholars P167182 FINISHED
Object legendary or mythologized king LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legendary or mythologized king | Statement: [Mesh-ki-ang-gasher, consideredByModernScholars, legendary or mythologized king]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: consideredByModernScholars
Context triple: [Mesh-ki-ang-gasher, consideredByModernScholars, legendary or mythologized king]
  • A. evaluatedByModernScholarsAs chosen
    Indicates that something has been judged or characterized in a particular way by contemporary academic or scholarly experts.
  • B. questionedByScholars
    Indicates that the subject has been critically examined, challenged, or doubted by scholars or academic researchers.
  • C. consideredByScience
    Indicates that something is regarded, evaluated, or treated as valid or relevant within the framework, methods, or consensus of scientific inquiry.
  • D. historicallyConsidered
    Indicates that one entity has been regarded or classified in a particular way relative to another entity during a past historical period.
  • E. areConsideredByOtherLinguists
    Indicates that certain items, concepts, or analyses are regarded or evaluated in a particular way by linguists other than the primary or referenced one.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348ea7ffc8190a2ab43d80277cf59 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6aff9c1008190a02f0a8ff0728d0d completed May 3, 2026, 2:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aca59d4881908d14ed47962703bd completed May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:49 p.m.