Triple

T31835432
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Publius Vatinius E812657 entity
Predicate wasEnemyOf P172646 FINISHED
Object the Optimates faction NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: the Optimates faction | Statement: [Publius Vatinius, wasEnemyOf, the Optimates faction]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasEnemyOf
Context triple: [Publius Vatinius, wasEnemyOf, the Optimates faction]
  • A. laterEnemyOf
    Indicates that one entity becomes an enemy of another at a later time, after not initially being in an antagonistic relationship.
  • B. formerEnemyOf
    Indicates that one entity was previously an enemy of another entity, but that adversarial relationship no longer holds.
  • C. hasFriendEnemyRelationshipWith
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are simultaneously connected as both friends and enemies, reflecting a mixed or ambivalent association between them.
  • D. archenemyOf
    Indicates a relationship in which one entity is the principal or most important enemy of another, often characterized by deep, ongoing opposition or rivalry.
  • E. initiallyEnemyOf
    Indicates that one entity starts out in a state of enmity or opposition toward another at the beginning of a specified time or situation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348ea7ffc8190a2ab43d80277cf59 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6b034bc74819091250f91ba5174c0 completed May 3, 2026, 2:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aca59d4881908d14ed47962703bd completed May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6af7d92008190aead47eaae8cc091 completed May 3, 2026, 2:14 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:48 p.m.