Triple
T31821963
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | BiCS FLASH |
E812284
|
entity |
| Predicate | advantageOverPlanarNAND |
P35142
|
FINISHED |
| Object | higher capacity |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: higher capacity | Statement: [BiCS FLASH, advantageOverPlanarNAND, higher capacity]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: advantageOverPlanarNAND Context triple: [BiCS FLASH, advantageOverPlanarNAND, higher capacity]
-
A.
hasAdvantageOverPlanarNAND
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses a performance, efficiency, or functional benefit when compared to planar NAND technology.
-
B.
advantageOverSATA
Indicates that one entity has a performance or functional benefit when compared to SATA.
-
C.
advantageOverHDD
Indicates that one entity possesses a benefit, superiority, or improvement when compared to a hard disk drive (HDD).
-
D.
disadvantageComparedToHDD
Indicates that one entity is less favorable or performs worse than a hard disk drive (HDD) in some specified aspect or context.
-
E.
disadvantageComparedToSATA
Indicates that something has a drawback, limitation, or weaker performance when compared to SATA.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348e97fa48190aa06286962af6dee |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6af805ffc8190b314514836f9ffdb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aca59d4881908d14ed47962703bd |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:46 p.m.