Triple
T31817609
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edward E. Soda |
E812177
|
entity |
| Predicate | isMajorBenefactor |
P53600
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Edward E. Soda, isMajorBenefactor, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isMajorBenefactor Context triple: [Edward E. Soda, isMajorBenefactor, true]
-
A.
philanthropicBeneficiary
Indicates that one entity is the recipient or target of another entity’s philanthropic giving or charitable support.
-
B.
isMajorAward
Indicates that an award is recognized as highly prestigious or of primary importance within its field or context.
-
C.
isMajor
Indicates that an entity holds primary or greater significance, importance, or rank relative to others in a given context.
-
D.
benefactor
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides help, support, or resources to another, typically in a generous or supportive role.
-
E.
notablePhilanthropicBeneficiary
Indicates that an entity is a significant recipient of philanthropic donations, support, or charitable contributions from another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348e846c081908eb468a0665afd55 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcf825ca7081909d06b0df33eb33f9 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcf42160f0819096812a8bf590875e |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:20 p.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:45 p.m.