Triple
T31813229
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LMO |
E812065
|
entity |
| Predicate | isInNATOStructure |
P69480
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [LMO, isInNATOStructure, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isInNATOStructure Context triple: [LMO, isInNATOStructure, true]
-
A.
roleInNATO
Indicates the specific capacity, position, or function an entity holds within the organizational or operational structure of NATO.
-
B.
hasNATOContext
chosen
Indicates that something is related to, influenced by, or situated within the context of NATO, its activities, policies, or structures.
-
C.
NATOcode
Indicates that there is a specified NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) code assigned to or associated with an entity.
-
D.
associatedWithNATO
Indicates a relationship in which an entity has a formal or recognized connection, affiliation, or involvement with NATO.
-
E.
hasParticipatingNATOAllies
Indicates that an entity is involved in an activity, operation, or arrangement together with one or more NATO member states as allies.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348e846c081908eb468a0665afd55 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6afebd7ec8190ab696f363d84abf0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aca3dedc81908b519d53d2909868 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:44 p.m.