Triple
T31809832
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Texas Music Office programs |
E811972
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cultural advocacy programs |
C33263
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: cultural advocacy programs Context triple: [Texas Music Office programs, instanceOf, cultural advocacy programs]
-
A.
cultural institution program
chosen
A cultural institution program is a structured set of activities, events, or initiatives designed by a cultural organization to engage audiences, interpret and present cultural content, and fulfill its educational, artistic, or social mission.
-
B.
cultural advocate
A cultural advocate is an individual who actively promotes, protects, and amplifies the values, traditions, and creative expressions of a particular community or culture within broader social, political, and institutional contexts.
-
C.
cultural district program
A cultural district program is an organized initiative that designates and supports specific geographic areas to foster arts, heritage, and creative economic development through coordinated policies, funding, and community partnerships.
-
D.
cultural heritage programme
A cultural heritage programme is an organized set of initiatives designed to identify, preserve, promote, and transmit a community’s tangible and intangible cultural assets across generations.
-
E.
cultural policy
Cultural policy is the set of principles, decisions, and actions through which governments and institutions shape the production, distribution, access to, and preservation of cultural expressions and heritage.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348e846c081908eb468a0665afd55 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:43 p.m.