Triple

T31793142
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Inversion of Control E811522 entity
Predicate delegatesControlTo P64239 FINISHED
Object framework LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: framework | Statement: [Inversion of Control, delegatesControlTo, framework]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: delegatesControlTo
Context triple: [Inversion of Control, delegatesControlTo, framework]
  • A. canDelegateTo
    Indicates that one entity has the authority or ability to transfer or assign its responsibilities, tasks, or decision-making power to another entity.
  • B. mayDelegateTo
    Indicates that one entity is permitted to transfer or assign its authority, responsibility, or rights to another entity.
  • C. allocatesControlTo chosen
    Indicates that decision-making authority or control over something is assigned or transferred from one entity to another.
  • D. endedControlOf
    Indicates that one entity has ceased to exercise authority, influence, or governance over another entity or domain.
  • E. transferredControlFrom
    Indicates that authority or control over something has been moved or handed over from one entity to another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348e60748819082dcaa7792659803 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6ac1b460481909fd5c89485645533 completed May 3, 2026, 1:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aa21f2508190a204a424ffc00ca6 completed May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:39 p.m.