Triple

T31788049
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tomb of Amenemope E811383 entity
Predicate treasuresComparison P157031 FINISHED
Object comparable in richness to other royal Tanis tombs LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: comparable in richness to other royal Tanis tombs | Statement: [Tomb of Amenemope, treasuresComparison, comparable in richness to other royal Tanis tombs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: treasuresComparison
Context triple: [Tomb of Amenemope, treasuresComparison, comparable in richness to other royal Tanis tombs]
  • A. treasureOwnedBy
    Indicates that a particular treasure is possessed or legally held by a specific owner.
  • B. goldComparedIn chosen
    Indicates that two or more entities are being compared with respect to their gold-related attributes, values, or quantities.
  • C. treasureInvolved
    Indicates that a situation, event, or action involves or is related to treasure in some significant way.
  • D. treasureMadeFor
    Indicates that a treasure was specifically created, crafted, or designated for a particular recipient, purpose, or context.
  • E. metalComparedWith
    Indicates a comparison being made between two metals in terms of some property, quality, or characteristic.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348e60748819082dcaa7792659803 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6ac16ae288190912a7c82fef90dac completed May 3, 2026, 1:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aa21f2508190a204a424ffc00ca6 completed May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:38 p.m.