Triple

T31784513
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Central Massif E811291 entity
Predicate highestMassifOf P157832 FINISHED
Object Picos de Europa NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Picos de Europa | Statement: [Central Massif, highestMassifOf, Picos de Europa]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: highestMassifOf
Context triple: [Central Massif, highestMassifOf, Picos de Europa]
  • A. highestMassifAmong chosen
    Indicates that one massif has the greatest height or prominence among a specified set of massifs.
  • B. nearestMountainMassif
    Indicates that one mountain massif is the closest in distance to a given reference location or entity compared to all other mountain massifs.
  • C. isPartOfHighestMassifOf
    Indicates that one entity is a constituent part or subfeature of the highest massif within a given geographic or topographic context.
  • D. nearHighestPeakOf
    Indicates that one entity is located close to the highest peak of another referenced geographic or topographic feature.
  • E. prominenceOfHighestPeak_m
    Indicates the vertical prominence, in meters, of the highest peak relative to the lowest contour line encircling it and no higher summit.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348e544a48190ab6e700b05f6438c completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb563aec448190875410fb1a3ed624 completed May 6, 2026, 2:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fb35b9ede881908aaae93a215525df completed May 6, 2026, 12:36 p.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:37 p.m.