Triple

T31778799
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Russell 2000 Growth Index E811137 entity
Predicate styleSplit P173456 FINISHED
Object growth and value partitions of Russell 2000 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: growth and value partitions of Russell 2000 | Statement: [Russell 2000 Growth Index, styleSplit, growth and value partitions of Russell 2000]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: styleSplit
Context triple: [Russell 2000 Growth Index, styleSplit, growth and value partitions of Russell 2000]
  • A. styleSegment
    Indicates a relationship where one segment is characterized or defined by a particular style or formatting.
  • B. styleFor
    Indicates a relationship where one entity defines, specifies, or is used as the style or styling configuration applied to another entity.
  • C. styleInFull
    Indicates that something is presented, written, or expressed in its complete, unabbreviated, or fully detailed form.
  • D. styleCategory
    Indicates the stylistic classification or genre category that an item, work, or entity belongs to.
  • E. styleContribution
    Indicates a relationship where one entity contributes to or influences the stylistic characteristics or aesthetic qualities of another.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348e544a48190ab6e700b05f6438c completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6b56ed31481908c3e5d749e46bad9 completed May 3, 2026, 2:39 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6b3a7bdb481908d16a32f49e38c2c completed May 3, 2026, 2:32 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6b49339048190b617a6749f648825 completed May 3, 2026, 2:36 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:35 p.m.