Triple

T31776310
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SLC (single-level cell) E811072 entity
Predicate hasErrorRate P172288 FINISHED
Object lower raw bit error rate than MLC LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lower raw bit error rate than MLC | Statement: [SLC (single-level cell), hasErrorRate, lower raw bit error rate than MLC]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasErrorRate
Context triple: [SLC (single-level cell), hasErrorRate, lower raw bit error rate than MLC]
  • A. hasErrorLogging
    Indicates that an entity is equipped with or supports functionality for recording and tracking errors or failures.
  • B. hasApproximateRate
    Indicates that one entity is associated with another entity representing an estimated or non-exact rate or frequency.
  • C. failureRate
    Indicates the proportion or frequency at which a system, component, or process fails over a specified set of operations or time period.
  • D. hasFailureProbability
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a likelihood or chance that it will fail within a given context or conditions.
  • E. top5ErrorRate
    Indicates the proportion of instances where the correct answer is not among the top five predicted results.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348e544a48190ab6e700b05f6438c completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6abe15d5c81909ccf4ce37f78bc43 completed May 3, 2026, 1:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aa21f2508190a204a424ffc00ca6 completed May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6aac95c1481909fff33702d0a6c37 completed May 3, 2026, 1:54 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:35 p.m.