Triple
T31774805
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Romanian law enforcement agencies |
E811036
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMainAgency |
P10898
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Romanian Police |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Romanian Police | Statement: [Romanian law enforcement agencies, hasMainAgency, Romanian Police]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMainAgency Context triple: [Romanian law enforcement agencies, hasMainAgency, Romanian Police]
-
A.
hadAgency
Indicates that an entity actively initiated, controlled, or was responsible for an action or outcome, rather than being a passive participant.
-
B.
isAgencyFor
Indicates that one entity functions as an agent or representative acting on behalf of another entity.
-
C.
hasParentAgencyType
Indicates that an agency is associated with or falls under a parent agency of a specified type.
-
D.
hasKeyAgency
chosen
Indicates that an entity serves as the primary responsible or controlling agency for another entity, action, or process.
-
E.
hasMainRepresentative
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary or official representative of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348e544a48190ab6e700b05f6438c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0049e40d60819081e3899d8d9fca51 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 9:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0048c47b548190ad31b2901cc3784a |
completed | May 10, 2026, 8:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:34 p.m.