Triple
T31735727
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Michigan Proposal 2 (2006) |
E809987
|
entity |
| Predicate | supremeCourtHolding |
P172483
|
FINISHED |
| Object | upheld as constitutional in 2014 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: upheld as constitutional in 2014 | Statement: [Michigan Proposal 2 (2006), supremeCourtHolding, upheld as constitutional in 2014]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supremeCourtHolding Context triple: [Michigan Proposal 2 (2006), supremeCourtHolding, upheld as constitutional in 2014]
-
A.
SupremeCourtHoldingRelatedTo
Indicates that there is a connection between a Supreme Court holding and another legal element, such as a case, issue, statute, or principle, to which that holding specifically relates.
-
B.
lawsuitRelatedSupremeCourtHolding
Indicates that the lawsuit is connected to, influenced by, or governed by a specific holding or decision of the Supreme Court.
-
C.
SupremeCourtVote
Indicates the voting decision or stance taken by a justice (or justices) in a case before the Supreme Court.
-
D.
chiefJusticeAtDecision
Indicates that the specified person was serving as the chief justice at the time a particular decision was made.
-
E.
leadingJudgmentBy
Indicates a relationship where one judgment or legal decision is treated as the primary or authoritative basis guiding or influencing another judgment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348e0e4908190a884582eca646fb7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6abe15d5c81909ccf4ce37f78bc43 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aa20a1588190a53533fc9764efb2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6aaf31a548190b2f792ff4b8c002a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:54 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:23 p.m.