Triple
T31735447
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edward Joseph Strieff Jr. |
E809981
|
entity |
| Predicate | caseOutcomeForEvidence |
P30903
|
FINISHED |
| Object | evidence deemed admissible under attenuation doctrine |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: evidence deemed admissible under attenuation doctrine | Statement: [Edward Joseph Strieff Jr., caseOutcomeForEvidence, evidence deemed admissible under attenuation doctrine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: caseOutcomeForEvidence Context triple: [Edward Joseph Strieff Jr., caseOutcomeForEvidence, evidence deemed admissible under attenuation doctrine]
-
A.
providesEvidenceFor
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
-
B.
appliesRulesOfEvidence
Indicates that one party enforces or follows established rules of evidence in relation to another party or proceeding.
-
C.
legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
chosen
Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
-
D.
resultOfAccusation
Indicates that one entity is the outcome, consequence, or product of an accusation made by another entity.
-
E.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348e0e4908190a884582eca646fb7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6ab22f464819098766f11b1c3c846 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aa20a1588190a53533fc9764efb2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:23 p.m.