Triple

T31735438
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Edward Joseph Strieff Jr. E809981 entity
Predicate hadOutstanding P172480 FINISHED
Object arrest warrant LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: arrest warrant | Statement: [Edward Joseph Strieff Jr., hadOutstanding, arrest warrant]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadOutstanding
Context triple: [Edward Joseph Strieff Jr., hadOutstanding, arrest warrant]
  • A. hasHad
    Indicates that an entity previously experienced, possessed, or was involved in something at some point in the past.
  • B. hadOfficialStatus
    Indicates that an entity possessed a formally recognized or legally sanctioned status within an official system or authority.
  • C. hasOngoing
    Indicates that one entity is currently engaged in, experiencing, or maintaining an activity, state, or process that has not yet concluded.
  • D. hadNo
    Indicates that one entity completely lacked or did not possess another entity, attribute, or relationship.
  • E. heldAfter
    Indicates that one event or state occurs or is maintained at some point in time after another specified event or state.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348e0e4908190a884582eca646fb7 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6abe15d5c81909ccf4ce37f78bc43 completed May 3, 2026, 1:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aa20a1588190a53533fc9764efb2 completed May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6aaf31a548190b2f792ff4b8c002a completed May 3, 2026, 1:54 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:23 p.m.