Triple
T31688760
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jamaican general election, 2016 |
E808729
|
entity |
| Predicate | JLPLeaderAtElection |
P139361
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Andrew Holness |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Andrew Holness | Statement: [Jamaican general election, 2016, JLPLeaderAtElection, Andrew Holness]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: JLPLeaderAtElection Context triple: [Jamaican general election, 2016, JLPLeaderAtElection, Andrew Holness]
-
A.
partyLeaderAtElection
chosen
Indicates that a person served as the leader of a political party at the time of a specific election.
-
B.
leaderOfLiberalDemocratsAtElection
Indicates that a person holds the position of leader of the Liberal Democrats at the time of a specified election.
-
C.
otherMajorPartyLeader
Indicates that one person is the leader of a different major political party than the other person.
-
D.
electedCandidate
Indicates that a particular person has been chosen as the winner in an election for a given position or office.
-
E.
majorParty4Leader
Indicates that the subject is the leader of a fourth major political party in a given political system or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348ddcbc48190950cabcc25ff29b3 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6aaf50be08190a2b62a6d881f8aee |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aa20a1588190a53533fc9764efb2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:07 p.m.