Triple

T31685260
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Qur’an 46:13 E808640 entity
Predicate exegesisField P102848 FINISHED
Object tafsir literature LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tafsir literature | Statement: [Qur’an 46:13, exegesisField, tafsir literature]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exegesisField
Context triple: [Qur’an 46:13, exegesisField, tafsir literature]
  • A. hasExegesisBy
    Indicates that an entity (such as a text or passage) is the subject of an exegesis authored or provided by another entity.
  • B. styleOfExegesis
    Indicates the particular interpretive method or approach applied when analyzing or explaining a text.
  • C. scripturalCorpusAnalyzed chosen
    Indicates that a particular scriptural corpus has been examined or studied, typically in a systematic or scholarly manner.
  • D. scripturalExpertise
    Indicates a relationship where one entity possesses specialized knowledge or authoritative understanding of religious scriptures in relation to another entity or context.
  • E. evaluationInBible
    Indicates an assessment, judgment, or characterization of something as it appears or is treated within the context of the Bible.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348ddcbc48190950cabcc25ff29b3 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6aaf50be08190a2b62a6d881f8aee completed May 3, 2026, 1:55 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aa20a1588190a53533fc9764efb2 completed May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:06 p.m.