Triple

T31664914
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Munhwaŏ E808098 entity
Predicate hasStandardVocabularyPolicy P198141 FINISHED
Object preference for native Korean words LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: preference for native Korean words | Statement: [Munhwaŏ, hasStandardVocabularyPolicy, preference for native Korean words]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStandardVocabularyPolicy
Context triple: [Munhwaŏ, hasStandardVocabularyPolicy, preference for native Korean words]
  • A. hasVocabularyFrom
    Indicates that one entity’s vocabulary, terminology, or set of terms is derived from, based on, or taken from another entity.
  • B. hasVocabularySize
    Indicates the size or number of vocabulary items possessed or used by an entity.
  • C. hasKnownVocabulary
    Indicates that an entity possesses a defined, identifiable set of terms or words that it can recognize or use.
  • D. hasDistinctVocabulary
    Indicates that one entity’s vocabulary is different or distinguishable from that of another entity.
  • E. hasStandardizedGrammar
    Indicates that a language or notation follows an officially defined and consistently applied set of grammatical rules.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348dbeef4819080b446a7feb6340b completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fecd0a732c819097bdd3eb69b6158c completed May 9, 2026, 5:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fecc0318d481908b5b20598a76a9fe completed May 9, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fecd091abc8190872974de731a80fa completed May 9, 2026, 5:58 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:58 p.m.