Triple

T31664774
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject South Korean won E808095 entity
Predicate localNameRomanization P157446 FINISHED
Object Daehanminguk won NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Daehanminguk won | Statement: [South Korean won, localNameRomanization, Daehanminguk won]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: localNameRomanization
Context triple: [South Korean won, localNameRomanization, Daehanminguk won]
  • A. nameInLanguageRomanization
    Indicates that an entity’s name is represented in the romanized (Latin-script) form of a particular language.
  • B. exampleRomanization chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a romanized representation (in Latin script) of the other entity’s original text or name.
  • C. hasRomanizationOf
    Indicates that one entity is a romanized representation (written in the Latin alphabet) of the other entity’s original script form.
  • D. romanizationFrom
    Indicates that one entity is a romanized representation derived from the script or writing system of another entity.
  • E. romanizationVariantOf
    Indicates that one written form is a different romanized representation of the same underlying word or expression as another.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348dbeef4819080b446a7feb6340b completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6d74b20a48190900dda1014cc13a8 completed May 3, 2026, 5:04 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6d26f27dc8190ae426a3e1573933e completed May 3, 2026, 4:43 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:58 p.m.