Triple
T31656792
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Amandus |
E807877
|
entity |
| Predicate | isOlderFormOf |
P166199
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Amanda (feminine form) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Amanda (feminine form) | Statement: [Amandus, isOlderFormOf, Amanda (feminine form)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isOlderFormOf Context triple: [Amandus, isOlderFormOf, Amanda (feminine form)]
-
A.
isYoungerVersionOf
Indicates that one entity represents the same individual as another entity, but at an earlier, younger stage in their life.
-
B.
isModernFormOf
Indicates that one entity is a newer or contemporary version, adaptation, or evolution of another earlier entity.
-
C.
isTraditionalFormOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the historically established or customary version from which another, typically more modern or variant, form is derived.
-
D.
isLesserKnownFormOf
Indicates that one entity is a less widely recognized or less commonly used variant, version, or form of another entity.
-
E.
isVersionOf
Indicates that one entity is a particular version, edition, or variant derived from another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348daf95c81908b4c985b7ddcd0b3 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6a95f453081908414920057d97c90 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:48 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6a757c6e081908e37631e5d8d246b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:55 p.m.