Triple
T31650965
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dino the Dinosaur |
E807728
|
entity |
| Predicate | intellectualPropertyForm |
P129967
|
FINISHED |
| Object | trademark |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trademark | Statement: [Dino the Dinosaur, intellectualPropertyForm, trademark]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: intellectualPropertyForm Context triple: [Dino the Dinosaur, intellectualPropertyForm, trademark]
-
A.
intellectualPropertyType
chosen
Indicates the specific category or kind of intellectual property associated with an entity (e.g., patent, copyright, trademark).
-
B.
ownsIntellectualProperty
Indicates that one entity holds legal ownership rights over the intellectual property created, produced, or associated with another entity.
-
C.
intellectualPropertyStatus
Indicates the legal condition or protection state of an entity’s intellectual property, such as whether it is patented, copyrighted, trademarked, pending, or unprotected.
-
D.
usesIntellectualProperty
Indicates that one entity makes use of another entity's intellectual property, such as patents, copyrights, trademarks, or trade secrets, in its activities or products.
-
E.
intellectualPropertyMode
Indicates the manner or framework in which intellectual property rights are defined, managed, or applied within a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348daf95c81908b4c985b7ddcd0b3 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6a959b4948190999f86efb6244d0e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:48 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6a757c6e081908e37631e5d8d246b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:53 p.m.