Triple

T31646819
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject System F E807603 entity
Predicate hasTypeConstructor P197594 FINISHED
Object universal type (forall type) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: universal type (forall type) | Statement: [System F, hasTypeConstructor, universal type (forall type)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeConstructor
Context triple: [System F, hasTypeConstructor, universal type (forall type)]
  • A. hasConstructorType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or defined by, a specific type of constructor (e.g., a particular construction method, pattern, or signature).
  • B. hasConstructor
    Indicates that an entity defines or is associated with a specific constructor used to create or initialize instances of it.
  • C. hasTypeParameter
    Indicates that one entity is defined with a type parameter that is represented or referenced by the other entity.
  • D. hasTypeChecker
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or utilizes a specific type checker component or mechanism.
  • E. hasRuntimeType
    Indicates that an entity is of, or conforms to, a specific type when evaluated at runtime rather than at compile time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348d9ce58819093ea2da83cbeeec1 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe9dfaa2d08190b2084f63f842eb6b completed May 9, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe9bba947c81908b0b2b92a4d19b37 completed May 9, 2026, 2:28 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe9df9561c8190a068f91c9fc78e56 completed May 9, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:51 p.m.