Triple
T31646538
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Moscow ML |
E807597
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ML-family programming language implementation |
C5489
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: ML-family programming language implementation Context triple: [Moscow ML, instanceOf, ML-family programming language implementation]
-
A.
ML-family language
An ML-family language is a statically typed, functional-first programming language lineage characterized by type inference, algebraic data types, pattern matching, and a strong, expressive type system originating from the MetaLanguage (ML).
-
B.
programming language implementation
chosen
A programming language implementation is the concrete realization of a language’s specification, including its compiler or interpreter, runtime system, and associated tools that translate and execute programs written in that language.
-
C.
Haskell infrastructure project
A Haskell infrastructure project is a foundational software system, tooling, or service built in Haskell that supports, automates, or enhances the development, deployment, and operation of other Haskell applications.
-
D.
functional programming language
A functional programming language is a programming paradigm where computation is treated as the evaluation of mathematical functions, emphasizing immutability, first-class functions, and avoidance of side effects.
-
E.
gradually typed programming language
A gradually typed programming language is one that allows both static and dynamic typing in the same codebase, enabling developers to optionally add or refine type annotations over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348d9ce58819093ea2da83cbeeec1 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:51 p.m.