Triple
T31645306
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Varali |
E807568
|
entity |
| Predicate | famousCompositionComposer |
P47024
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tyagaraja |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tyagaraja | Statement: [Varali, famousCompositionComposer, Tyagaraja]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: famousCompositionComposer Context triple: [Varali, famousCompositionComposer, Tyagaraja]
-
A.
favoriteComposer
Indicates that one entity is the preferred or most liked composer of another entity.
-
B.
hasMusicalComposer
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the musical composer responsible for creating the music associated with another entity.
-
C.
notableComposerOfType
Indicates that an entity is a well-known or distinguished composer associated with a specified type, category, or genre of composition.
-
D.
catalogueOfComposer
Indicates that one entity is a catalogue that systematically lists or documents the works of a particular composer.
-
E.
associatedComposerMovement
Indicates a relationship linking a composer to a specific musical movement or stylistic period with which they are connected.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348d9ce58819093ea2da83cbeeec1 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6afebd7ec8190ab696f363d84abf0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6aca3dedc81908b519d53d2909868 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:50 p.m.