Triple

T31636145
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject causal dynamical triangulations E807317 entity
Predicate seeksToExplain P5130 FINISHED
Object emergence of classical general relativity LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: emergence of classical general relativity | Statement: [causal dynamical triangulations, seeksToExplain, emergence of classical general relativity]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: seeksToExplain
Context triple: [causal dynamical triangulations, seeksToExplain, emergence of classical general relativity]
  • A. aimsToExplain chosen
    Indicates that one entity intends to clarify, make understandable, or provide an explanation about another entity, concept, or situation.
  • B. usedToExplain
    Indicates that one entity serves as an explanation or clarification for another entity.
  • C. aimsToUnderstand
    Indicates an intention or effort by one entity to gain knowledge, insight, or comprehension about another entity or subject.
  • D. claimsToExplain
    Indicates that one entity asserts it can provide a clarification, account, or understanding of another entity or phenomenon.
  • E. laterExplained
    Indicates that an earlier event, statement, or situation is clarified or made understandable by information provided at a subsequent time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348d892948190915f8facacb9568c completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6a916d2e08190bafc01cba73b6469 completed May 3, 2026, 1:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6a757c6e081908e37631e5d8d246b completed May 3, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:47 p.m.