Triple

T31623301
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Avocettina infans E806951 entity
Predicate hasBilateralSymmetry P50368 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Avocettina infans, hasBilateralSymmetry, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBilateralSymmetry
Context triple: [Avocettina infans, hasBilateralSymmetry, true]
  • A. isBilateral
    Indicates that the relationship or interaction involves two sides, parties, or entities mutually.
  • B. symmetryOf
    Indicates that one entity is the symmetry counterpart or symmetric form of another entity, typically related by a specific symmetry operation or transformation.
  • C. hasAsymmetry
    Indicates that one entity exhibits a lack of symmetry or an uneven, non-mirrored relationship or structure relative to another entity.
  • D. bilaterallyPaired
    Indicates that the relationship or structure involves two corresponding or matching parts on opposite sides of a central axis.
  • E. isSymmetrical chosen
    Indicates that an object, pattern, or configuration remains unchanged or mirrored when transformed by a symmetry operation such as reflection, rotation, or inversion.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348d7883c8190b6c13ab92b7ef076 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6ffbad8848190867c2988c0ceb84f completed May 3, 2026, 7:56 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6fc53f4f881908dcc698687bbb64d completed May 3, 2026, 7:42 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:42 p.m.