Triple

T31617460
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Linc Hayes E806800 entity
Predicate worksUndercoverAs P140052 FINISHED
Object youthful informant LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: youthful informant | Statement: [Linc Hayes, worksUndercoverAs, youthful informant]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: worksUndercoverAs
Context triple: [Linc Hayes, worksUndercoverAs, youthful informant]
  • A. undercoverFor
    Indicates that one entity is secretly acting on behalf of or within another entity, typically to gather information or carry out covert objectives without revealing their true affiliation.
  • B. resultOfUndercoverWork
    Indicates that something occurs as a consequence of, or is produced by, undercover investigative work.
  • C. undercoverAgainst
    Indicates that one entity is secretly acting in a covert or deceptive capacity directed against another entity.
  • D. undercoverExpertise
    Indicates that an entity possesses specialized skills or knowledge specifically related to operating or functioning effectively in undercover or covert roles.
  • E. occupationInDisguise chosen
    Indicates that an entity’s true occupation is being concealed or performed under a false or hidden identity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348d61f2081908cad94bc9ffbb671 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f74c70fd248190a9d5543afcb08211 completed May 3, 2026, 1:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7478e3b548190a51d5d436e2bb036 completed May 3, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:39 p.m.