Triple

T31616836
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jordan Lyman E806779 entity
Predicate storyResolutionRole P161981 FINISHED
Object exposes coup plot LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: exposes coup plot | Statement: [Jordan Lyman, storyResolutionRole, exposes coup plot]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: storyResolutionRole
Context triple: [Jordan Lyman, storyResolutionRole, exposes coup plot]
  • A. resolvedByCharacter chosen
    Indicates that a particular issue, conflict, or problem is brought to a conclusion or solved through the actions or decisions of a specific character.
  • B. resolutionInStory
    Indicates the part of a narrative where the central conflicts are resolved and the story’s outcomes are finalized.
  • C. roleInStories
    Indicates the specific function, position, or character part an entity plays within one or more stories.
  • D. roleForProtagonist
    Indicates the specific narrative or functional role that an entity plays in relation to the story’s main protagonist.
  • E. inNarrativeRole
    Indicates that one entity participates in relation to another by occupying a specific narrative function or role within a story or discourse.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348d61f2081908cad94bc9ffbb671 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6df450014819099d118e5c2d697fa completed May 3, 2026, 5:38 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6de07836481908785cde9c511920b completed May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:39 p.m.