Triple
T31616466
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lancer Ranch |
E806770
|
entity |
| Predicate | homeOfFictionalFamily |
P49491
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lancer family |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lancer family | Statement: [Lancer Ranch, homeOfFictionalFamily, Lancer family]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: homeOfFictionalFamily Context triple: [Lancer Ranch, homeOfFictionalFamily, Lancer family]
-
A.
frequentedByFictionalFamily
Indicates that a place or establishment is regularly visited or commonly associated with a particular fictional family.
-
B.
ownedByFictionalFamily
Indicates that something is possessed or held in ownership by a fictional family within a narrative or fictional universe.
-
C.
hasFictionalFamily
Indicates that an entity is associated with a family that exists only within a fictional or imaginary context.
-
D.
introducesFictionalFamily
Indicates that one entity presents or brings a fictional family into a narrative, context, or audience’s awareness.
-
E.
houseOrFamily
chosen
Indicates that two entities are related through a shared house, household, or family membership.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348d61f2081908cad94bc9ffbb671 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6a8aac01c8190bd3ae7bb98512259 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6a75656e081908739ed9e2f600e42 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:39 p.m.