Triple

T31609844
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject French municipal system E806594 entity
Predicate mayorResponsibleFor P172592 FINISHED
Object implementation of municipal council decisions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: implementation of municipal council decisions | Statement: [French municipal system, mayorResponsibleFor, implementation of municipal council decisions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayorResponsibleFor
Context triple: [French municipal system, mayorResponsibleFor, implementation of municipal council decisions]
  • A. mayorRoleTypically
    Indicates that the specified role or position is typically held by, or commonly associated with, a mayor.
  • B. mayorAppointment
    Indicates that one entity appoints or designates another entity to serve in the role of mayor.
  • C. mayorType
    Indicates the specific category or role classification of a mayor in relation to their office or jurisdiction.
  • D. hasMayor
    Indicates that one entity serves as the mayor of another entity, typically a city, town, or municipality.
  • E. mayorSelection
    Indicates the process or outcome of choosing or appointing someone to serve as mayor of a place.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348d61f2081908cad94bc9ffbb671 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6ac1ed23c8190ace57ffc9d8a3dc6 completed May 3, 2026, 1:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aa1e84b88190b025f6ca40f17a8a completed May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6aba8fba48190bc1a17117244cae1 completed May 3, 2026, 1:58 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:36 p.m.