Triple

T31606608
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hanover E806505 entity
Predicate personalUnionEnd P86182 FINISHED
Object 1837 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1837 | Statement: [Hanover, personalUnionEnd, 1837]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: personalUnionEnd
Context triple: [Hanover, personalUnionEnd, 1837]
  • A. personalUnionResult
    Indicates that a personal union between entities has occurred and specifies the resulting combined political or dynastic arrangement.
  • B. relationshipEnd chosen
    Indicates that a previously existing relationship between entities has been terminated or has come to an end.
  • C. personalUnionPeriod
    Indicates a time span during which two or more distinct political entities are joined under a single ruler in a personal union.
  • D. partnerInUnionWith
    Indicates a mutual partnership or union relationship between two entities, such as a civil, domestic, or similar legally or socially recognized union.
  • E. formedPersonalUnionWith
    Indicates that one entity has entered into a close, unified personal relationship or alliance with another entity, often implying a merger of roles, identities, or interests.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348d54ccc8190a03b5df9a2b40b25 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6a87033148190a434c60c1f1191d8 completed May 3, 2026, 1:44 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6a75656e081908739ed9e2f600e42 completed May 3, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:35 p.m.